Bronco test vs Yo-Yo test: what is the difference?
The Bronco is a 1,200 m timed shuttle run of about 4 to 6 minutes. The Yo-Yo IR1 is a graded test of 20 m shuttles with 10 seconds of recovery after each, scored in metres. Studies of rugby players and referees found a strong link between them, but the authors say the scores are not interchangeable. In the one study that tested it, the Yo-Yo IR1 tracked match demands better than the Bronco.
How they differ
The Bronco is a time trial. Five sets of 20, 40 and 60 m out-and-backs run without a break, 1,200 m and 30 turns in total. The only result is the clock. It lasts 4 to 6 minutes for most players.
The Yo-Yo IR1 is a graded test. Players run 2 × 20 m shuttles at a speed set by an audio track, then walk for 10 seconds, and the speed rises through the test. The result is the distance covered before the player fails twice.
| Bronco | Yo-Yo IR1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Format | fixed distance, timed | graded, stopped at failure |
| Shuttle | 20, 40 and 60 m out-and-backs | 2 × 20 m, then 10 s recovery |
| Recovery | none | 10 s after every shuttle pair |
| Audio track | none | required |
| Distance | 1,200 m for everyone | 1,400 m takes about 11 min 40 s, 2,040 m about 16 min 40 s |
| Turns | 30 | one every 20 m |
| Result | total time | distance in metres |
The Yo-Yo distances and durations come from the 20 m table behind the Yo-Yo IR1 page, which counts the recoveries.
What the studies found
Two studies put the tests side by side.
Professional players. Sella and colleagues (2021) tested 133 rugby union professionals on both tests. The correlations were very large, r = −0.74 and 0.71. The signs differ because a faster Bronco is a shorter time. The authors still conclude that the scores are not interchangeable.
Amateur referees. Sant’Anna and colleagues (2023) tested 67 amateur referees on both tests and measured their match demands with GNSS trackers. The two scores correlated at r = −0.88, a stronger link than in the players. Yo-Yo IR1 distance correlated with five match measures: total distance, high-intensity distance, maximal speed, high-intensity accelerations and sprints. The Bronco was significantly linked to two: maximal speed and high-intensity accelerations. The authors suggest the Yo-Yo IR1 may be the more valuable test for assessing a referee’s match fitness.
Referees are not players. The result does not say the Yo-Yo IR1 predicts a forward’s match. It says that in this sample, the longer test carried more information about match demands.
What each test is good for
The Bronco is quick and looks like the game. It needs four cones and a stopwatch. One player is done in under six minutes, so a whole squad can be tested in a single session. See the Bronco page for the course and for published Super Rugby times.
The Yo-Yo IR1 tests recovery. The 10 seconds of walking after each shuttle pair are what separates players with the same top speed. The test needs a recording, a third line for the recovery area and room for a walking zone, and it takes longer for fitter players.
Which to run in pre-season
- Short on time, or testing often? The Bronco.
- Want to see how a player recovers between efforts? The Yo-Yo IR1.
- Need a pace for conditioning? Neither: run a beep test to get a MAS. The Bronco vs beep test page explains why.
- Already have a season of data on one of them? Keep it. A change of test breaks every comparison with the earlier results.
Whichever you choose, keep the surface, the time of day and the warm-up the same. A short warm-up can cost a Bronco runner several seconds, and a slippery surface changes both tests.
Reading the two together
If a player is fast on the Bronco but low on the Yo-Yo IR1, they are probably quick and able to turn but lose fitness when efforts repeat. The reverse points to a player who sustains work but is slower over short, sharp distances. Both profiles tell you what to train. Neither one tells you to drop the other test.
Go further
- 01Bronco test for rugby: how teams use itQuestions
- 02Bronco test vs beep test: what is the difference?Questions
- 03What is a good Yo-Yo IR1 score for soccer players?Questions
- 04How do you convert a Yo-Yo IR1 level to distance?Questions
- 05Bronco test (rugby)Tests
- 06Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Level 1Tests
- 07Yo-Yo IR1 calculator: level to distance and VO₂maxCalculator
Frequently asked questions
Are the Bronco and the Yo-Yo IR1 the same thing?
No. The Bronco is a fixed-distance time trial with no recovery. The Yo-Yo IR1 is a graded test with a recovery after every shuttle pair, run until the player fails. Studies find a strong link between the two scores, but not an equivalence.
Which one predicts match performance better?
In a study of 67 amateur rugby referees, Yo-Yo IR1 distance correlated with five of the match measures tested, while the Bronco correlated with two. That is evidence about amateur referees, not about players.
Can I use a Yo-Yo score to estimate a Bronco time?
No. The link is strong in published samples, but it is not tight enough to predict one player’s result from the other. The authors of the player study say the scores are not interchangeable.
Sources
- Sant’Anna R. T., Roberts S., Moore L., Kraak W., Stokes K., “Comparing the Yo-Yo intermittent and Bronco tests and their associations with match demands among amateur rugby union referees”, International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2023; 18(1): 67-77, doi:10.1177/17479541221078280 (record and abstract on the University of Bath research portal) — 67 amateur referees; Yo-Yo IR1 vs Bronco r = -0.88; Yo-Yo IR1 correlated with total and high-intensity distance, maximal speed, high-intensity accelerations and sprints; Bronco only with maximal speed and high-intensity accelerations; abstract read on 2026-10-19, full text not consulted
- Sella F. S., Hébert-Losier K., Beaven C. M., McMaster D. T., Harvey M., Gill N. D., “Performance in the 1.2 km shuttle run test reflects fitness capacities in rugby players”, Journal of Australian Strength and Conditioning, 2021 — 133 rugby union professionals; Bronco vs Yo-Yo IR1 r = -0.74 and 0.71, scores described as not interchangeable; record read on 2026-10-14, full text not consulted
- Bangsbo J., Iaia F. M., Krustrup P., “The Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test: a useful tool for evaluation of physical performance in intermittent sports”, Sports Medicine, 2008; 38(1): 37-51 — Yo-Yo IR1 protocol
- Bronco and Yo-Yo IR1 tables — distances and durations from the tables behind the Cadlo Bronco and Yo-Yo IR1 pages